The mass report letter ＂found out＂ the corruption case of land acquisition and demolition and defrauded 5.9 million demolition funds.

　　CCTV News:Land requisition and demolition is a good thing to speed up urban construction and improve the living standards of citizens. However, it has made some people smell the "business opportunity" of making ill-gotten gains. Recently, Jianggan District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province has received an anonymous tip-off letter about land acquisition and demolition. What is this?

　　Recently, the Supervision Committee of the Commission for Discipline Inspection of Jianggan District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province has received anonymous reports from the masses, reflecting that Zhou Yuefu of Niutian Community took advantage of his position to assist the people’s government in land acquisition and relocation management and accepted bribes in the fields of land acquisition, demolition and engineering development and construction during his tenure as party secretary.

　　Du Weimin, Deputy Director of the Third Discipline Inspection and Supervision Office of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Jianggan District, Hangzhou: "We inquired about Zhou Yuefu’s relevant bank account, and found that from 2009 to 2016, Shen Mingda and Chen Zhiming sent money to Zhou Yuefu and his daughter several times. Through the analysis of Shen Mingda and Chen Zhilin, it is found that there is an intersection between them, which is Hangzhou Sanyuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. "

　　This Hangzhou Sanyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. came into the sight of investigators. After investigation, it was during Zhou Yuefu’s tenure as Party Secretary of Niutian Community that he helped this company that did not have the land use qualification to obtain the land use right of the Science and Technology Park. In the land acquisition and relocation in 2010, the company received compensation of more than 5.9 million yuan. So, does Zhou Yuefu have any improper interests with this company?

　　Du Weimin, Deputy Director of the Third Discipline Inspection and Supervision Office of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Jianggan District, Hangzhou: "At the beginning of the nuclear project, we also collected the information about Sanyuan Electronics’ investment promotion and land transfer. All the spearheads were directed at Zhou Yuefu. Because of Zhou Yuefu’s signature, Zhou Yuefu also went up as a promoter of investment promotion. There is doubt."

　　Taking bribes? Buy? 10% shares in doubt

　　With these questions, the investigators first questioned Zhou Yuefu, who had been detained for other problems. In the face of interrogation, Zhou Yuefu either kept his mouth shut or insisted that the remittance sent to him by Shen Mingda and others was his actual contribution to buy 10% shares of the company. When the investigators inquired about Shen Mingda and other shareholders, Shen Mingda and others also asserted in unison that Zhou Yuefu held 10% of the company’s shares through capital contribution. So, is this an ordinary business activity or a fact of accepting bribes in the name of dividends?

　　Break the "impeccable" offensive and defensive alliance

　　According to the industrial and commercial registration materials of Hangzhou Sanyuan Electronics Company, Zhou Yuefu’s name did not appear in the list of shareholders, but both Zhou Yuefu and Sanyuan Electronics Company insisted that Zhou Yuefu held shares in the company. Is it an offensive and defensive alliance to deal with the investigation or is it true?

　　When inquiring about the shareholders of Sanyuan Electronics Company, a detail caught the attention of investigators. Shen Mingda and others stated that the factory building was built in 2000, but the industrial and commercial registration materials show that the company was registered and established in 2002, and the factory building was completed before the company was established. With this question, the investigators decided to make a field visit to Niutian community.

　　villagerIn 2000, there were farmland ditches and roads, and there were no buildings here.

　　In order to further verify the information obtained, the investigators retrieved the satellite remote sensing map of the area involved according to the procedure.

　　investigador: "According to the satellite images we retrieved, you see that this land was still a farmland in 2001, and only in 2007 did the building they mentioned appear here, and it was an illegal steel shed?"

　　Tampering with the building year to defraud 5.9 million demolition funds.

　　Why are the buildings that only appeared in 2007 written in 2000 in the evaluation report? What is the mystery behind the year change? It turns out that according to the documents on land acquisition and demolition in Jianggan District of Hangzhou, only buildings that existed before 2000 can enjoy the compensation for demolition. Buildings that only appeared in 2007 can only be counted as illegal buildings and cannot be compensated for demolition. The purpose of the year change is to defraud the compensation for land acquisition and demolition.

　　Then, how did the building that only appeared in 2007 turn into 2000 in this assessment report? Zhou Yuefu, then the village party secretary, held the power to confirm the right of land acquisition, demolition and relocation in that year. With the collusion of Sanyuan Electronics Company and Zhou Yuefu, this false evaluation report was finally released. With the change of one year, Sanyuan Electronics Company defrauded 5.9 million compensation for demolition, of which Zhou Yuefu was indispensable.

　　The main briber Shen Mingda: "In the process of buying this land, Yue Fu tried his best to recommend it, because we told him that when the time comes, it means that we will send him 10% of the performance shares, and he also acquiesced in it."

　　Bribery Zhou Yuefu: "Against the policy, I gave them to Sanyuan Electronics Company and used them. Help them say that it is good for me, and I also seek personal gain. And use their own authority to seek personal gain. "

　　The first case of taking lien measures against bribers in Hangzhou

　　It turned out that knowing that things were about to be exposed, Shen Mingda and other bribers agreed before being questioned that "you can’t say anything if you are killed" and burned the "small account book" that recorded the spoils. They thought that as long as they didn’t speak, the fact of bribery could not be found out, and they could ensure their "safety" with Zhou Yuefu. Unexpectedly, their wishful thinking was empty. Since the bribery scheme was put forward and implemented by Shen Mingda alone, and his behavior of obstructing the investigation was particularly serious, in order to prevent him from continuing to collude or destroy evidence, the Jianggan District Supervision Committee took lien measures against him with the approval of the superior supervision Committee.

　　The main briber Shen Mingda: "I regret it now because I gave someone money to put myself in. I really regret it."

　　This is the first case of taking lien measures against bribers in Hangzhou. According to the second clause of Article 22 of the Supervision Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), the supervisory organ may take lien measures against the persons involved in bribery or joint duty crimes in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

　　Ye Su, Secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission of Jianggan District and Director of the Supervisory Committee: "After detaining the main briber, it should be said that it played a key role in the breakthrough of the whole case. At the same time, we also combined the performance of the whole briber in this process and the amount of money involved in his case, and we should investigate and implement this bribery together in this case, that is, we should investigate the criminal responsibility of the briber."